Re: [PATCH V2] Add support for flag status register on Micron chips.

[Marek Vasut]

On Monday, April 14, 2014 at 06:19:24 PM, Graham Moore wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 13, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> 
> >> +#define      OPCODE_RDFSR            0x70  /* read flag status register
> >> */
> > 
> > I know this is not your fault, but can you please indent this properly
> > with tabs?
> > 
> >>  #define      OPCODE_NORM_READ        0x03    /* Read data bytes (low
> > 
> > frequency) */
> > 
> >>  #define      OPCODE_FAST_READ        0x0b    /* Read data bytes (high
> > 
> > frequency) */
> > 
> >>  #define      OPCODE_QUAD_READ        0x6b    /* Read data bytes */
> > 
> > And fix this one in a separate patch to use tabs as well please ?
> 
> I'm rebasing on l2-mtd spinor, and the tabs are jacked up there too.
> I'll fix the
> one I added, and fix other tabs in a new patch on that branch.

I know :( , thanks!

> [...]
> 
> > I wonder, can't wait_till_ready() be made a wrapper that will check the
> > USE_FSR flag and call correct wait-function ? This would avoid adding a
> > new member to *flash and also would avoid so many changes throughout the
> > code. What do you think?
> 
> Yeah, that's kind of ugly, but the flags exist only in the static
> m25p_ids[] and are only
> used in the scan/init.  I'd have to add a new member to save them for
> later use.
> And then other uses would crop up.  So, seemed kinda iffy either way.
> 
> It's going to change anyway, because l2-mtd spinor branch has refactored
> wait_till_ready() such that it uses a function pointer from the new
> spi_nor struct.
> I'm still mulling it over :)

Roger that, I'll wait for the V3 . Thanks!

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/