question on read_barrier_depends

[Oliver Neukum]

Hi,

I am looking at memory ordering and a question hit me.
I was looking at the kfifo code. kfifo_put() has a barrier:

			)[__kfifo->in & __tmp->kfifo.mask] = \
				(typeof(*__tmp->type))__val; \
			smp_wmb(); \
			__kfifo->in++; \

Looking at kfifo_get() 

		__ret = !kfifo_is_empty(__tmp); \
		if (__ret) { \
			*(typeof(__tmp->type))__val = \
				(__is_kfifo_ptr(__tmp) ? \

A thought struck me. There is no corresponding barrier. I cannot
help myself, but I think there needs to be a smp_read_barrier_depends()
between reading kfifo->in (in kfifo_is empty) and reading val.
What do you think?

	Regards
		Oliver


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/