Re: [PATCH RFC] PM / Hibernate: no kernel_power_off when pm_power_off NULL

[Sebastian Capella]

On 15 April 2014 14:18, Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue 2014-04-15 21:54:53, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>> What I'm basically saying is that I see no reason for ARM to do something
>> different to what x86 does.
>>
>> What is pretty clear to me is that ARM is compatible with x86, which is
>> compatible with kernel/reboot.c, and it's the hibernate code which is
>> the odd one out.
>
> I'm pretty sure the original code did not return. Anyway, the best
> solution, given how many platforms are out there, would be to
>
> a) document that it should not return
>
> b) fix hibernation to handle the returning case, anyway.

Thanks Russell and Pavel!

This sounds fine to me.  Any objections?

Thanks!

Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/