Re: [PATCH v9 05/19] qspinlock: Optimize for smaller NR_CPUS

[Waiman Long]

On 04/17/2014 11:50 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:57AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> > +#if !defined(__LITTLE_ENDIAN)&&  !defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
> > +#error "Missing either LITTLE_ENDIAN or BIG_ENDIAN definition."
> > +#endif
> This seems entirely superfluous, I don't think a kernel build will go
> anywhere if either is missing.

Yes, I am on the conservative side when I add that. I can certainly take 
it out if you think that is not needed.

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/