Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86/uncore: modularize Intel uncore driver
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Apr 18 2014 - 06:54:25 EST
* Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch adds support for building Intel uncore driver as module.
> It adds clean-up code and config option for the Intel uncore driver
>
> Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> move config option to "General setup/Kernel Performance Events and Counters"
>
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 3 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> init/Kconfig | 10 ++++++
> 3 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> index 7fd54f0..5d3da70 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
> @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_AMD) += perf_event_amd_iommu.o
> endif
> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_p6.o perf_event_knc.o perf_event_p4.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_lbr.o perf_event_intel_ds.o perf_event_intel.o
> -obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_uncore.o perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL) += perf_event_intel_rapl.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_PERF_X86_INTEL_UNCORE) += perf_event_intel_uncore.o
> endif
>
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> index 618d502..fd5e883 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_uncore.c
So I'm not willing to apply this patch until the documentation of
perf_event_intel_uncore.c is improved. Right now the file starts
without a single comment (!). Just lines after lines of code, without
any explanation what it does, what its scope is, etc.
How should even a knowledgable user know about what it's all about?
That problem percolates to the Kconfig entry as well:
> --- a/init/Kconfig
> +++ b/init/Kconfig
> @@ -1502,6 +1502,16 @@ config PERF_EVENTS
>
> Say Y if unsure.
>
> +config PERF_X86_INTEL_UNCORE
> + default y
> + tristate "Intel uncore performance monitoring support"
> + depends on PERF_EVENTS && CPU_SUP_INTEL && PCI
> + help
> + This option allows kernel to access the Uncore performance
> + monitoring units of Intel processors.
> +
> + Say Y if unsure.
Firstly, it should probably not be 'default y'.
Secondly, the description is essentially non-existent. What does the
hardware do? Why should users care about uncore PMUs?
This needs to be fixed before we can make this modular.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/