[PATCH V2 10/19] tick-common: call tick_check_percpu() from tick_check_preferred()

[Viresh Kumar]

tick_check_percpu() and tick_check_preferred() are called from two places and in
exactly same order. So, would make sense to call tick_check_percpu() from
tick_check_preferred() instead, so that their caller can just call
tick_check_preferred().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/time/tick-common.c | 10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 965e9c3..9d3106b 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -233,6 +233,9 @@ static bool tick_check_percpu(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 				 struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 {
+	if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
+		return false;
+
 	/* Prefer oneshot capable device */
 	if (!(newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)) {
 		if (curdev && (curdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT))
@@ -257,9 +260,6 @@ static bool tick_check_preferred(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 bool tick_check_replacement(struct clock_event_device *curdev,
 			    struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 {
-	if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, smp_processor_id()))
-		return false;
-
 	return tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev);
 }
 
@@ -276,10 +276,6 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct clock_event_device *newdev)
 	if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, newdev->cpumask))
 		goto out_bc;
 
-	/* cpu local device ? */
-	if (!tick_check_percpu(curdev, newdev, cpu))
-		goto out_bc;
-
 	/* Preference decision */
 	if (!tick_check_preferred(curdev, newdev))
 		goto out_bc;
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/