Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

[Lee Jones]

> Mark,
> 
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 04:12:29PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >> An issue was discovered with tps65090 where sometimes the FETs
> >> wouldn't actually turn on when requested (they would report
> >> overcurrent).  The most problematic FET was the one used for the LCD
> >
> > This is basically fine but you said it depends on one of the previous
> > patches which you didn't CC me on so I've no idea what's going on
> > there?
> 
> Sorry about that.  :(
> 
> Lee has Acked the caching patch.  Lee: what's the best way for you and
> Mark to coordinate there?  Should he apply the caching patch with your
> Ack?

If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable
branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the
next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or
receive a pull-request from Mark with mine applied.

Up to Mark.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/