Re: [PATCH] tty: Fix race condition between __tty_buffer_request_room and flush_to_ldisc

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 11:55:52AM +0100, One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 10:10:17 +0200
> Manfred Schlaegl <manfred.schlaegl@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > On 2014-04-08 14:42, Manfred Schlaegl wrote:
> > > The race was introduced while development of linux-3.11 by
> > > e8437d7ecbc50198705331449367d401ebb3181f and
> > > e9975fdec0138f1b2a85b9624e41660abd9865d4.
> > > Originally it was found and reproduced on linux-3.12.15 and
> > > linux-3.12.15-rt25, by sending 500 byte blocks with 115kbaud to the
> > > target uart in a loop with 100 milliseconds delay.
> > > 
> > > In short:
> > >  1. The consumer flush_to_ldisc is on to remove the head tty_buffer.
> > >  2. The producer adds a number of bytes, so that a new tty_buffer must
> > > 	be allocated and added by __tty_buffer_request_room.
> > >  3. The consumer removes the head tty_buffer element, without handling
> > > 	newly committed data.
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Reminder: The Problem is still existent in linux-3.11, 3.12, 3.13. 3.14 and pre 3.15 kernels.
> > 
> > The lastly delivered patch cleanly applies to pre 3.15 (torvalds tree) and 3.14(.1).
> 
> Greg ?? what is happening about this one. We can't just ignore losing
> bytes caused by incorrect lock removal. We are seeing breakages in things
> like bluetooth over serial which are quite probably down to this problem.

It's in my queue, sorry, been traveling...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/