Re: [PATCH] netprio_cgroup: explicitly init the early_init field
From: Neil Horman
Date: Tue Apr 22 2014 - 07:19:51 EST
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:32:02PM +0800, Jianyu Zhan wrote:
> For a cgroup subsystem who should init early, then it should carefully
> take care of the implementation of css_alloc, because it will be called
> before mm_init() setup the world.
>
> Luckily we don't, and we better explicitly assign the early_init field
> to 0, for document reason.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4836@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> net/core/netprio_cgroup.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
> index 13ddd68..fc21035 100644
> --- a/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
> +++ b/net/core/netprio_cgroup.c
> @@ -250,6 +250,7 @@ struct cgroup_subsys net_prio_cgrp_subsys = {
> .css_free = cgrp_css_free,
> .attach = net_prio_attach,
> .base_cftypes = ss_files,
> + .early_init = 0,
> };
>
> static int netprio_device_event(struct notifier_block *unused,
> --
> 2.0.0-rc0
>
>
NACK, for the same reason that it doesn't make sense for net_classid.
Early_init should already be zero. What problem are you trying to solve here?
Neil
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/