Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] regulator: tps65090: Make FETs more reliable by adding retries

[Doug Anderson]

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > If there are cross-subsystem dependencies I prefer to use immutable
>> > branches to eliminate any change of merge conflicts in -next or the
>> > next merge window. I'm happy to either create on with Mark's Acks, or
>> > receive a pull-request from Mark with mine applied.
>>
>> > Up to Mark.
>>
>> Well, Doug didn't send me the MFD patch so I can't do anything with it
>> anyway.
>
> Ah!
>
> Doug,
>   what exactly are the dependencies within the set?

I will repost the patch shortly with Mark on the CC list.  Status of
the patches in this series:

- Patch #1 (mfd no irq) has no dependencies, though patch #2 won't
  work without it.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004441/

Acked by you.  Not landed anywhere that I'm aware of.

--

- Patch #2 (charger polling) can be applied without patch #1 but won't
  actually make charger polling work without it.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004461/

Not acked or applied anywhere.

---

- Patch #3 (caching) can be applied before retries patch but not
  after.

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4033361/

This is the patch we need.  I just resent with Mark on the CC list
(including your ack).

---

- Patch #4 (overcurrent wait time) can be applied before retries patch
  but not after (just due to merge conflicts, no other reason).

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004471/

I believe Mark has already applied.

---

- Patch #5 (retries) absolutely requires patch #3 (caching).

https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4004521/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/