Re: [PATCH V2 01/19] tick: trivial cleanups

[Frederic Weisbecker]

On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 03:24:57PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index 6558b7a..9e9ddba 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -108,7 +108,6 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(void)
>  	return period;
>  }
>  
> -
>  static void tick_sched_do_timer(ktime_t now)
>  {
>  	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> @@ -248,8 +247,8 @@ void tick_nohz_full_kick_all(void)
>  		return;
>  
>  	preempt_disable();
> -	smp_call_function_many(tick_nohz_full_mask,
> -			       nohz_full_kick_ipi, NULL, false);
> +	smp_call_function_many(tick_nohz_full_mask, nohz_full_kick_ipi, NULL,
> +			       false);

Breaking < 80 char lines is arguable although I'm not sure it still matters in 2014.

But I don't see much the point of the above change. I usually prefer when line contents
are a bit balanced. It may be a matter of taste I guess.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/