Re: [PATCHSET 0/9] perf tools: Fixup for the --percentage change

[Namhyung Kim]

Hi Ingo,

On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 11:55:57 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> I gave it some quick testing and after fixing a trivial merge conflict 
> in tools/lib/lockdep/Makefile all seems to be working fine.

Thanks for testing!

>
> But while looking at it I remembered one of my old UI complains about 
> perf top and report, the hard to read nature of:
>
>    Event count (approx.): 226958779
>
> the values displayed are typically way too large to be easily human 
> readable. More importantly, they are also nonsensical! That we have a 
> sampling interval and can sum up all the intervals sampled has very 
> little meaning to the overwhelming majority of humans looking at the 
> data.
>
> And printing that just spams the visual field and confuses people.
>
> People care about the quality and speed of sampling itself, not 
> directly the interval of sampling (which will often be variable with 
> auto-freq sampling).

You meant 'period' by 'interval', right?

There's --show-total-period option (should be equivalent to -F period
later) in perf report, so there might be people want to see the numbers
IMHO.

>
> So instead of:
>
>   Samples: 42K of event 'cycles', Event count (approx.): 226958779
>
> How about only printing this in 'perf top' and 'perf report':
>
>   Captured 42.1K 'cycles' event samples
>
> Note the extra decimal (which helps monitor smaller changes as well), 
> and note the different wording.
>
> Thoughts?

Well, I'm okay to add the extra decimal, but it seems that it only makes
sense when the unit is 'K'..

And I think it might be worth adding filtered sample count as well if
filtering is enabled something like:

  Captured 13.2K/42.1K 'cycles' event samples


Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/