Re: [perf] yet another 32/64-bit range check failure

[Vince Weaver]

On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Vince Weaver wrote:
> 
> I suppose I should make a patch for attr->sample_type and 
> attr->read_format which after a quick audit seem to exhibit the same 
> problem?

nevermind, PERF_FORMAT_MAX and PERF_SAMPLE_MAX are enum values, not 
#defines, so they handle being 64-bit properly.

Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/