Re: [PATCH 3.8 110/133] nfsd4: fix memory leak in nfsd4_encode_fattr()

From: Kamal Mostafa
Date: Wed Apr 23 2014 - 12:36:06 EST


On Wed, 2014-04-23 at 11:56 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote:
> Hi Kamal,
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 01:14:08PM -0700, Kamal Mostafa wrote:
> > 3.8.13.22 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > commit 18df11d0eacf67bbcd8dda755b568bbbd7264735 upstream.
> >
> > fh_put() does not free the temporary file handle.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > [ kamal: backport to 3.8 (context) ]
> > Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > index dc12d02..1418028 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4xdr.c
> > @@ -2430,8 +2430,10 @@ out_acl:
> >
> > out:
> > kfree(acl);
> > - if (fhp == &tempfh)
> > + if (fhp == &tempfh) {
> > fh_put(&tempfh);
> > + kfree(tempfh);
>
> This doesn't look correct to me as in 3.8 kernel the tempfh variable
> is a 'struct svc_fh' and not a dynamically allocated structure.
>
> This has changed only with commit d50e613 "nfsd4: decrease
> nfsd4_encode_fattr stack usage", where tempfh was converted into a
> 'struct svc_fh *'.
>
> So, I believe you should drop this patch from 3.8.


Ouch! Good catch, Luis. I'll drop it from 3.8-stable.

Thanks for your review!

-Kamal


> Cheers,
> --
> LuÃs
>
> > + }
> > return status;
> > out_nfserr:
> > status = nfserrno(err);
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
> >
> > --
> > kernel-team mailing list
> > kernel-team@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/