Re: [PATCH 1/4] memcg, mm: introduce lowlimit reclaim

[Johannes Weiner]

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 05:11:20PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Fri 02-05-14 11:04:34, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> [...]
> > > @@ -2236,12 +2246,9 @@ static unsigned __shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> > >  		do {
> > >  			struct lruvec *lruvec;
> > >  
> > > -			/*
> > > -			 * Memcg might be under its low limit so we have to
> > > -			 * skip it during the first reclaim round
> > > -			 */
> > > -			if (follow_low_limit &&
> > > -					!mem_cgroup_reclaim_eligible(memcg, root)) {
> > > +			/* Memcg might be protected from the reclaim */
> > > +			if (force_memcg_guarantee &&
> > 
> > respect_?  consider_?
> 
> enforce_ ?

A native speaker might be better at this, but to me it seems weird to
enforce a promise.  honor_memcg_guarantee?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/