Re: [tip:locking/core] rwsem: Add comments to explain the meaning of the rwsem's count field
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon May 05 2014 - 13:26:22 EST
* Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 01:46 -0700, tip-bot for Tim Chen wrote:
> > Commit-ID: 3cf2f34e1a3d4d5ff209d087925cf950e52f4805
> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3cf2f34e1a3d4d5ff209d087925cf950e52f4805
> > Author: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > AuthorDate: Fri, 2 May 2014 12:53:57 -0700
> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > CommitDate: Sun, 4 May 2014 20:34:26 +0200
> >
>
> Ingo,
>
> Can you pick up this version of the patch instead. I've updated the
> comments to reflect all cases for which the rwsem's count is less
> than WAITING_BIAS, as Peter has pointed out.
Please send a delta patch against the one I applied - and also the
state diagram suggestion with Peter, once it's clear what form it
should take. I've yet to see a state diagram that was inferior to
equivalent textual description - is this case an exception to that?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/