Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2)

[Steven Rostedt]

On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 
> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than
> "printk_once_deferred"?  Think so.  It's (((printk(deferred(once))),
> not (((printk(once(deferred))).
> 

I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my:

Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

also, perhaps this series should include my patch:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/