Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2)

[John Stultz]

On 05/05/2014 11:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>  
>> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than
>> "printk_once_deferred"?  Think so.  It's (((printk(deferred(once))),
>> not (((printk(once(deferred))).
>>
> I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, will do!

>
> also, perhaps this series should include my patch:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336

So this set applies ontop of -mm, which I believe includes your change.

If I try to cherry-pick your patch to include in my set, I think I have
to cherry-pick Jan's changes as well, so its probably just easier for
folks to grab -mm. :)
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/