Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work

[Rik van Riel]

On 05/06/2014 07:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:19:47AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> As an aside, it also looks like SD_BALANCE_WAKE is set on all domains
>> of a NUMA system by default, so even the non-affine wakeup will end
>> up looking for the lowest load NUMA node to start up on.
> 
> I can't find it being set on anything by default.

                .flags                  = 1*SD_LOAD_BALANCE
                                        | 1*SD_BALANCE_NEWIDLE
                                        | 0*SD_BALANCE_EXEC
                                        | 0*SD_BALANCE_FORK
                                        | 0*SD_BALANCE_WAKE
                                        | 0*SD_WAKE_AFFINE
                                        | 0*SD_SHARE_CPUPOWER
                                        | 0*SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES
                                        | 1*SD_SERIALIZE
                                        | 0*SD_PREFER_SIBLING
                                        | 1*SD_NUMA
                                        | sd_local_flags(level)


static inline int sd_local_flags(int level)
{
        if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE)
                return 0;

        return SD_BALANCE_EXEC | SD_BALANCE_FORK | SD_WAKE_AFFINE;
}

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/