Re: [PATCH v7 1/2] phy: Add new Exynos5 USB 3.0 PHY driver

[Vivek Gautam]

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:35 AM, Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sylwester,
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
> <s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On 28/04/14 08:17, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>> Add a new driver for the USB 3.0 PHY on Exynos5 series of SoCs.
>>> The new driver uses the generic PHY framework and will interact
>>> with DWC3 controller present on Exynos5 series of SoCs.
>>> Thereby, removing old phy-samsung-usb3 driver and related code
>>> used untill now which was based on usb/phy framework.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <gautam.vivek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> Changes from v6:
>>>  - Addressed review comments:
>>>    -- Sorted config entries in Kconfig and Makefile
>>>    -- Made #define to_usbdrd_phy(inst) to a static inline routine.
>>>    -- Restructured exynos5_rate_to_clk() as suggested.
>>>    -- Amended 'val' field for regmap_update_bits() in the routine
>>>       exynos5_usbdrd_phy_isol().
>>>    -- Removed sentinel entry from exynos5_usbdrd_phy_cfg[] struct.
>>>    -- Removed check for 'match' entry in probe().
>>>
>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt        |   40 ++
>>>  drivers/phy/Kconfig                                |   11 +
>>>  drivers/phy/Makefile                               |    1 +
>>>  drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c                   |  627 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 679 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 drivers/phy/phy-exynos5-usbdrd.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
>>> index b422e38..51efe4c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/samsung-phy.txt
>>> @@ -114,3 +114,43 @@ Example:
>>>               compatible = "samsung,exynos-sataphy-i2c";
>>>               reg = <0x38>;
>>>       };
>>> +
>>> +Samsung Exynos5 SoC series USB DRD PHY controller
>>> +--------------------------------------------------
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible : Should be set to one of the following supported values:
>>> +     - "samsung,exynos5250-usbdrd-phy" - for exynos5250 SoC,
>>> +     - "samsung,exynos5420-usbdrd-phy" - for exynos5420 SoC.
>>> +- reg : Register offset and length of USB DRD PHY register set;
>>> +- clocks: Clock IDs array as required by the controller
>>> +- clock-names: names of clocks correseponding to IDs in the clock property;
>>> +            Required clocks:
>>> +     - phy: main PHY clock (same as USB DRD controller i.e. DWC3 IP clock),
>>> +            used for register access.
>>> +     - ref: PHY's reference clock (usually crystal clock), used for
>>> +            PHY operations, associated by phy name. It is used to
>>> +            determine bit values for clock settings register.
>>> +            For Exynos5420 this is given as 'sclk_usbphy30' in CMU.
>>> +- samsung,pmu-syscon: phandle for PMU system controller interface, used to
>>> +                   control pmu registers for power isolation.
>>> +- samsung,pmu-offset: phy power control register offset to pmu-system-controller
>>> +                   base.
>>
>> It doesn't seem right to have register offset encoded in the device tree
>> like this. I think it'd be more appropriate to associate such an offset
>> with the compatible string's value in the driver.
>
> Ok, it makes more sense.
> Just out of curiosity, what difference would this make ?

Moreover, in case of Exynos5420 (and may be in future SoCs), where we
have 2 USB DRD PHY controllers,
we will need to have a way around to deal with two separate offsets in
the driver for one compatible string.

Getting the offsets from DT seems a cleaner way to handle this case of
multi controllers.

[snip]


-- 
Best Regards
Vivek Gautam
Samsung R&D Institute, Bangalore
India
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/