Re: [PATCH 02/10 V2] workqueue: destroy_worker() should destroy idle workers only

[Lai Jiangshan]

On 05/13/2014 05:08 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2014 at 02:56:14PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>> @@ -1692,9 +1691,8 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(void)
>>   * create_worker - create a new workqueue worker
>>   * @pool: pool the new worker will belong to
>>   *
>> - * Create a new worker which is bound to @pool.  The returned worker
>> - * can be started by calling start_worker() or destroyed using
>> - * destroy_worker().
>> + * Create a new worker which is attached to @pool.
>> + * The new worker must be started and enter idle via start_worker().
> 
> Please always fill the comment paragarphs to 75 column or so.  Also,

> do we even need start_worker() separate anymore?  Maybe we can just
> fold alloc_and_create_worker() into alloc_worker()?

We should do this I think. but it is just cleanup, I will do it after
this core patchset is accepted.

> 
>> @@ -1815,6 +1812,7 @@ static int create_and_start_worker(struct worker_pool *pool)
>>   * @worker: worker to be destroyed
>>   *
>>   * Destroy @worker and adjust @pool stats accordingly.
>> + * The worker should be idle.
> 
> Ditto about filling.
> 
> Looks good otherwise.
> 
> Thanks.
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/