Re: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Tue, 13 May 2014, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Tue, 13 May 2014 15:00:09 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>  
> > Good points -- I was indeed thinking about stress testing instead of
> > algorithmic testing.
> 
> But doesn't lockdep use algorithmic tests too?

Kinda, but only for the deadlock detection.

I'm not sure if we want to inflict PI correctness and set_scheduler()
interaction to lockdep.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/