Re: [patch 1/3] rtmutex: Add missing deadlock check

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Wed, 14 May 2014, Darren Hart wrote:
> On May 13, 2014 11:54 PM, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I'll gladly accept new functional/algorithm type tests to futextest
> (performance stuff is probably going to perf instead, and Dave Miller beat

Dave Jones :)

> me to the fuzz tester with Trinity). But I think there is evidence we
> should build out the futex functional testing, and futextest seems a
> logical place for it.

Though as long as glibc is being silly we need to use the raw syscall
for it.

Thanks,

	tglx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/