Re: BUG?: super.c:sget spin_lock not released?

[Al Viro]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:49:56AM +0200, Kai wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I have recently been playing around with writing a custom filesystem
> for Linux, and have been reading the source of other filesystems, and
> the functions they call into the linux kernel.
> While looking at the function sget in super.c I found something strange.
> 
> before if(test) it takes a spinlock, however there seems to be two
> cases where it does not unlock it.
> (Kernel 3.14, super.c line 441)
> 
> One:
> if(!grab_super(old)) goto retry;
> Will jump to before spin_lock(), without releasing it first.

Er...  So either grab_super() releases that spinlock, or that thing
is screwed.  The next obvious step would be to look into grab_super()...

> Two:
> And if it finds an old sb, it will return without releasing the lock.

... unless something it calls does just that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/