Re: BUG?: super.c:sget spin_lock not released?

[Kai]

On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 1:19 AM, Al Viro <viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 12:49:56AM +0200, Kai wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have recently been playing around with writing a custom filesystem
>> for Linux, and have been reading the source of other filesystems, and
>> the functions they call into the linux kernel.
>> While looking at the function sget in super.c I found something strange.
>>
>> before if(test) it takes a spinlock, however there seems to be two
>> cases where it does not unlock it.
>> (Kernel 3.14, super.c line 441)
>>
>> One:
>> if(!grab_super(old)) goto retry;
>> Will jump to before spin_lock(), without releasing it first.
>
> Er...  So either grab_super() releases that spinlock, or that thing
> is screwed.  The next obvious step would be to look into grab_super()...
>
>> Two:
>> And if it finds an old sb, it will return without releasing the lock.
>
> ... unless something it calls does just that.

AH, I knew I was missing something. And so obvious too =(

Thank you for pointing it out to me.
Seems I need to spend more time reading the source code and figuring
out how it all connects.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/