Re: [PATCH] lib.c: skip --param parameters

From: David Rientjes
Date: Mon Jun 16 2014 - 19:49:00 EST


On Mon, 16 Jun 2014, Josh Triplett wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 01:43:06PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Very dumb patch to just skip --param allow-store-data-races=0 introduced in
> > newest Linux kernel buildsystem.
> >
> > Actually the option is present in few GCC versions and probably should be
> > handled properly.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> As far as I can tell, this seems to only handle "--param arg"; however,
> according to the thread on LKML, GCC handles --param=arg as well. Could
> you please handle that variant too?
>

This is only from linux-next and not Linus's tree, correct?

Is this still necessary since the "./Makefile: tell gcc optimizer to never
introduce new data races" patch has been removed from -mm due to failures?

See http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm-commits&m=140295825623471

> > lib.c | 7 +++++++
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib.c b/lib.c
> > index bf3e91c..e56037b 100644
> > --- a/lib.c
> > +++ b/lib.c
> > @@ -673,6 +673,12 @@ static char **handle_version(char *arg, char **next)
> > exit(0);
> > }
> >
> > +static char **handle_param(char *arg, char **next)
> > +{
> > + ++next;
> > + return ++next;
> > +}
> > +
> > struct switches {
> > const char *name;
> > char **(*fn)(char *, char **);
> > @@ -681,6 +687,7 @@ struct switches {
> > static char **handle_long_options(char *arg, char **next)
> > {
> > static struct switches cmd[] = {
> > + { "param", handle_param },
> > { "version", handle_version },
> > { NULL, NULL }
> > };
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/