Re: [PATCH] pwm-backlight: use devm_gpiod_get_optional()

[Lee Jones]

On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 10:54:47AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Make use of the new devm_gpiod_get_optional() to simplify the probe
> > > code.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/video/backlight/pwm_bl.c | 7 ++-----
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Looks good.  Applied, thanks.
> 
> Technically pwm_bl.c is my turf. However I only adopted it way back when
> the backlight subsystem was orphaned, but it seems Jingoo, Bryan and you
> are taking good care of it these days, so perhaps it would be a good
> idea to move it back to your custody?

Yeah, the whole 'driver maintainer' sketch could get pretty complex.
It's pretty clean-cut in the PWM subsystem as only one exists, but
Backlight and MFD have a whole bunch, and I don't usually wait for
them to Ack/Nack before applying or providing review comments.

I'm happy to play it however you like really.  I'm sure the boys and I
can handle it if you so wish.  Even better if you would say in the
MAINTAINERS file and provide review comments when patches are
submitted.  I do think all 'drivers/video/backlight' changes should go
in via the Backlight tree though.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/