Re: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect

[Stratos Karafotis]

Hi Doug,

On 12/07/2014 06:45 ÎÎ, Doug Smythies wrote:
> 
> On 2014.07.30 10:00 Stratos Karafotis wrote:
> 
>> This patchset changes slightly the calculation of target frequency to
>> eliminate the deadband effect (explained in patch 2 changelog) that it
>> seems to slow down the CPU in low and medium loads.
>>
>> Patch 1 introduces a new relation (RELATION_C) for the next frequency
>> selection, which chooses the closest frequency to target.
>>
>> Patch 2 is the actual change to ondemand governor.
> 
>> You may find graphs with the 'deadband' effect and benchmark results:
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/16kDBh5lyc6YvBnoS1hUa1t2O38z0xrWvaEj5XtJ8auw/edit#gid=2072493052
> 
> I did the same benchmark tests before (without) and after (with) this patch set on my i7-2600K system.
> I added the results, which are similar to Stratos', under a new "benchmark" tab on the spreadsheet.

Thank you very much for your benchmarks!

Stratos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/