RE: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: Add support IOC_MOV_DATA ioctl

[Dmitry Monakhov]

On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:33:21 +0900, Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 08:59:49PM +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
> > > This patch implements fs ioctl's IOC_MOV_DATA for XFS.
> > 
> > Shouldn't this share code with the XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT implementation?
> Lukas has raised the same question for ext4.
> Both xfs(XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT) and ext4(EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT) has ioctls which uses
> almost similar kind of structure as struct mov_data.
> As such, there seems to be possiblity for sharing basic code (I will try)
> used for sanity checking in IOC_MOV_DATA to be shared with these ioctls
> but the core functionality code will remain different.
> 
> Thanks!
Actually they are differ. EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT copy data inside kernel,
but XFS_IOC_SWAPEXT live this job to userpsace see:
http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=xfs/cmds/xfsprogs.git;a=blob;f=fsr/xfs_fsr.c packfile
And I'll vote to make EXT4_IOC_MOVE_EXT deprecated, and implement EXT4_IOC_SWAPEXT
as XFS does that.
Ted, Lukas what do you think about that?

> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/