On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Arnd Bergmann<arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:Rob,
On Friday 18 July 2014 14:31:39 Rob Herring wrote:Okay, if there is still an interrupt-map property, then I agree. This
IIRC, it's actually the correct way to do this here: the problem is that+This seems wrong. Legacy interrupts should be described with
+ Example:
+ pcie_msi_intc: msi-interrupt-controller {
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells =<1>;
+ interrupt-parent =<&gic>;
+ interrupts =<GIC_SPI 30 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 31 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 32 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 33 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 34 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 35 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 36 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 37 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
+
+pcie_intc: Interrupt controller device node for Legacy irq chip
+ interrupt-cells: should be set to 1
+ interrupt-parent: Parent interrupt controller phandle
+ interrupts: GIC interrupt lines connected to PCI Legacy interrupt lines
+
+ Example:
+ pcie_intc: legacy-interrupt-controller {
+ interrupt-controller;
+ #interrupt-cells =<1>;
+ interrupt-parent =<&gic>;
+ interrupts =<GIC_SPI 26 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 27 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 28 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>,
+<GIC_SPI 29 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING>;
+ };
interrupt-map and then PCI child devices have a standard interrupt
specifier.
I'm not sure about MSIs, but I would think they would have a standard
format too.
the PCI IRQs are not directly connected to the GIC, but instead there is
a nested irqchip that has each PCI IRQ routed to it and that requires
an extra EOI for each interrupt.
The interrupt-map in the PCI host points to this special irqchip rather
than to the GIC.
wasn't clear in the example.
Rob