Re: [PATCH] staging: visorchipset: fix sparse warnings about static declaration

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 10:10:22AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> Some functions were prototyped as static but the actual definition
> wasn't. While this is valid (the function is static because the two
> declarations don't conflict and the first one is static), this makes
> sparse unhappy and cause confusion of normal people too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Bernat <vincent@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../unisys/visorchipset/visorchipset_main.c        | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

This no longer applies cleanly to my tree, can you please refresh it and
resend so that I can apply it?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/