Re: [PATCHv9 2/4] mailbox: Introduce framework for mailbox
From: Lee Jones
Date: Fri Aug 01 2014 - 04:17:18 EST
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014, Jassi Brar wrote:
> On 23 July 2014 20:56, Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Jassi Brar wrote:
>
> >> >> + if (chan->txdone_method == (TXDONE_BY_POLL | TXDONE_BY_ACK))
> >> >> + chan->txdone_method = TXDONE_BY_POLL;
> >> >
> >> > Unless you're leaving it there for clarity, you can drop the
> >> > "TXDONE_BY_POLL |" from if().
> >> >
> >> We need to check for both.
> >
> > What I'm trying to get at is; if it's already TXDONE_BY_POLL, there is no
> > need to set it to TXDONE_BY_POLL.
> >
> In mbox_request_channel() we added the ACK flag, if POLL was set and
> now we need to revert that in mbox_free_channel().
Okay, I see what you're doing. Thanks for the clarification.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/