Re: [RFC PATCH 00/11] Refactor MSI to support Non-PCI device
From: Arnd Bergmann
Date: Mon Aug 04 2014 - 10:47:04 EST
On Monday 04 August 2014, Yijing Wang wrote:
> I have another question is some drivers will request more than one
> MSI/MSI-X IRQ, and the driver will use them to process different things.
> Eg. network driver generally uses one of them to process trivial network thins,
> and others to transmit/receive data.
>
> So, in this case, it seems to driver need to touch the IRQ numbers.
>
> wr-linux:~ # cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 .... CPU17 CPU18 CPU19 CPU20 CPU21 CPU22 CPU23
> ......
> 100: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0
> 101: 2 0 0 0 0 0 302830488 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-0
> 102: 110 0 0 0 0 360675897 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-1
> 103: 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-2
> 104: 107 0 0 9678933 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-3
> 105: 107 0 0 0 357838258 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-4
> 106: 115 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-5
> 107: 114 0 0 0 0 0 0 337866096 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-6
> 108: 373801199 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 IR-PCI-MSI-edge eth0-TxRx-7
>
I think in this example, you just need to request eight interrupts, and pass a
different data pointer each time, pointing to the napi_struct of each of the
NIC queues. The driver has no need to deal with the IRQ number at all,
and I would be surprised if it cared today.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/