[patch] mm: memcontrol: clean up reclaim size variable use in try_charge()
From: Johannes Weiner
Date: Mon Aug 04 2014 - 16:35:20 EST
Charge reclaim and OOM currently use the charge batch variable, but
batching is already disabled at that point. To simplify the charge
logic, the batch variable is reset to the original request size when
reclaim is entered, so it's functionally equal, but it's misleading.
Switch reclaim/OOM to nr_pages, which is the original request size.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 8d65dadeec1b..ec4dcf1b9562 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2574,7 +2574,7 @@ retry:
nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
- if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= batch)
+ if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
goto retry;
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
@@ -2588,7 +2588,7 @@ retry:
* unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
* to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
*/
- if (nr_reclaimed && batch <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
+ if (nr_reclaimed && nr_pages <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
goto retry;
/*
* At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
@@ -2606,7 +2606,7 @@ retry:
if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
goto bypass;
- mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(batch));
+ mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages));
nomem:
if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.0.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/