Re: [patch] mm: memcontrol: clean up reclaim size variable use in try_charge()
From: Michal Hocko
Date: Tue Aug 05 2014 - 08:26:42 EST
On Mon 04-08-14 16:35:02, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Charge reclaim and OOM currently use the charge batch variable, but
> batching is already disabled at that point. To simplify the charge
> logic, the batch variable is reset to the original request size when
> reclaim is entered, so it's functionally equal, but it's misleading.
>
> Switch reclaim/OOM to nr_pages, which is the original request size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/memcontrol.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 8d65dadeec1b..ec4dcf1b9562 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -2574,7 +2574,7 @@ retry:
>
> nr_reclaimed = mem_cgroup_reclaim(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, flags);
>
> - if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= batch)
> + if (mem_cgroup_margin(mem_over_limit) >= nr_pages)
> goto retry;
>
> if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NORETRY)
> @@ -2588,7 +2588,7 @@ retry:
> * unlikely to succeed so close to the limit, and we fall back
> * to regular pages anyway in case of failure.
> */
> - if (nr_reclaimed && batch <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
> + if (nr_reclaimed && nr_pages <= (1 << PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER))
> goto retry;
> /*
> * At task move, charge accounts can be doubly counted. So, it's
> @@ -2606,7 +2606,7 @@ retry:
> if (fatal_signal_pending(current))
> goto bypass;
>
> - mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(batch));
> + mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask, get_order(nr_pages));
> nomem:
> if (!(gfp_mask & __GFP_NOFAIL))
> return -ENOMEM;
> --
> 2.0.3
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/