[PATCH v2] spin_lock_nested(): Always evaluate second argument

[Bart Van Assche]

Evaluating a macro argument only if certain configuration options
have been selected is confusing and error-prone. Hence always
evaluate the second argument of spin_lock_nested().

An intentional side effect of this patch is that it avoids that
the following warning is reported for netif_addr_lock_nested()
when building with CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC=n and with W=1:

include/linux/netdevice.h: In function 'netif_addr_lock_nested':
include/linux/netdevice.h:2865:6: warning: variable 'subclass' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
  int subclass = SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING;
      ^

Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@xxxxxxx>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 include/linux/spinlock.h | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 3f2867f..485d5dc 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -197,7 +197,8 @@ static inline void do_raw_spin_unlock(raw_spinlock_t *lock) __releases(lock)
 		 _raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, &(nest_lock)->dep_map);	\
 	 } while (0)
 #else
-# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		_raw_spin_lock(lock)
+# define raw_spin_lock_nested(lock, subclass)		\
+	((void)(subclass), _raw_spin_lock(lock))
 # define raw_spin_lock_nest_lock(lock, nest_lock)	_raw_spin_lock(lock)
 #endif
 
-- 
1.8.4.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/