[PATCH] ASoC: fsl_sai: Make Synchronous and Asynchronous modes exclusive
From: Nicolin Chen
Date: Fri Aug 08 2014 - 06:40:37 EST
The previous patch (ASoC: fsl_sai: Add asynchronous mode support) added
new Device Tree bindings for Asynchronous and Synchronous modes support.
However, these two shall not be present at the same time.
So this patch just simply makes them exclusive so as to avoid incorrect
Device Tree binding usage.
Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt | 3 +--
sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c | 7 +++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt
index 77864f4..dc9f9c3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/fsl-sai.txt
@@ -38,8 +38,7 @@ Note:
default synchronous mode (sync Rx with Tx) will be used, which means both
transimitter and receiver will send and receive data by following clocks
of transimitter.
-- fsl,sai-asynchronous will be ignored if fsl,sai-synchronous-rx property is
- already present.
+- fsl,sai-asynchronous and fsl,sai-synchronous-rx are exclusive.
Example:
sai2: sai@40031000 {
diff --git a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
index ef7c758..4c9e71c 100644
--- a/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
+++ b/sound/soc/fsl/fsl_sai.c
@@ -634,6 +634,13 @@ static int fsl_sai_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
fsl_sai_dai.symmetric_channels = 1;
fsl_sai_dai.symmetric_samplebits = 1;
+ if (of_find_property(np, "fsl,sai-synchronous-rx", NULL) &&
+ of_find_property(np, "fsl,sai-asynchronous", NULL)) {
+ /* error out if both synchronous and asynchronous are present */
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid binding for synchronous mode\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
if (of_find_property(np, "fsl,sai-synchronous-rx", NULL)) {
/* Sync Rx with Tx */
sai->synchronous[RX] = false;
--
1.8.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/