Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] proc: intoduce proc_inode->pid_entry and is_tgid_pid_entry()

From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Sat Aug 09 2014 - 10:31:25 EST


On 08/09, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 08:57:47PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> ...
> > +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c
> > @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> > ei->pde = NULL;
> > ei->sysctl = NULL;
> > ei->sysctl_entry = NULL;
> > + ei->pid_entry = NULL;
> > ei->ns.ns = NULL;
> > ei->ns.ns_ops = NULL;
> > inode = &ei->vfs_inode;
>
> Hi Oleg, sorry for not responding to previous emails, will try to review this
> things tomorrow (from a glance looks quite good!). Btw, this moment strike my
> eyes -- why don't we use kmem_cache_zalloc here but do assign nils again and
> again, maybe worth to address as well?

Probably because this doesn't make sense to nullify proc_inode->vfs_inode,
it will be reinitialized at least by inode_init_always() anyway.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/