Re: [PATCH v3 tip/core/rcu 1/9] rcu: Add call_rcu_tasks()

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 08:19:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> How about we simply assume 'idle' code, as defined by the rcu idle hooks
> are safe? Why do we want to bend over backwards to cover this?

The thing is, we already have the special rcu trace hooks for tracing
inside this rcu-idle section, so why go beyond this now?

Attachment: pgpZCZ2FfMkrZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature