Re: [PATCH] mmc: rtsx: fix incorrect last byte in R2 response

[Roger]

On 08/11/2014 09:02 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 04:32:16PM +0800, rogerable@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > From: Roger Tseng <rogerable@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Current code erroneously fill the last byte of R2 response with an undefined
> > value. In addition, it is impossible to obtain the real values since the
> > controller actually 'offloads' the last byte(CRC7, end bit) while receiving R2
> > response. This could cause mmc stack to obtain inconsistent CID from the same
> > card after resume and misidentify it as a different card.
> >
> > Fix by assigning a dummy value 0x01 to the last byte of R2 response.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Roger Tseng <rogerable@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c |    1 +
> >   drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_usb_sdmmc.c |    1 +
> >   2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> > index dfde4a2..54849d8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/rtsx_pci_sdmmc.c
> > @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static void sd_send_cmd_get_rsp(struct realtek_pci_sdmmc *host,
> >   	}
> >
> >   	if (rsp_type == SD_RSP_TYPE_R2) {
> > +		ptr[16] = 1;
>
> Avoid magic numbers like 16 and 0x1.
>
> This is subtle enough that it deserves a comment.
>
> 		ptr[stat_idx] = 0x1 /* 0x1 chosen randomly */
The 0x1 consists of 7-bit dummy zero CRC and stop bit 1, described in SD 
card. Anyway, I'll give a comment to this in the next version.
> >   		for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> >   			cmd->resp[i] = get_unaligned_be32(ptr + 1 + i * 4);
> >   			dev_dbg(sdmmc_dev(host), "cmd->resp[%d] = 0x%08x\n",
>
> There are a lot of magic numbers in this function.  We could get rid
> of this i < 4 loop but doing:
>
> 		memcpy(cmd->resp, ptr + 1, resp_len);
>
> Currently we don't use resp_len and the resp_len = 5 assignment is off
> by one...  It should be resp_len = 4.  This function is quite ugly.

I can remove the unused rsp_len in this function. But I'm afraid the 
loop is still required. The destination cmd->resp is cpu-endian, but the 
raw response from SD card in the buffer (pointed by ptr) is big-endian.

> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
> ------Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
> .

Best regards,
Roger Tseng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/