Re: [PATCH] perf ui/tui: Fix a small callchain display bug

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Date: Wed Aug 13 2014 - 16:06:43 EST


Em Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 03:02:41PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> The currently when perf TUI report shows callchain, the first level
> chains have bogus '+' sign even though only the last one has children.
>
> Since they are on a single line of the chain, toggling intermediate
> entries has no effect. Fix it to show '+' sign at the last entry
> only. Note that non-first level callchain entries don't have this
> problem.
>
> Before:
>
> Children Self Command Shared Object Symbols
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please avoid starting a line with --- inside the changeset comment log as this
confuses scripts, that takes that as the end of the comment, like in ...
(see below)

> - 40.70% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_wrap_enter
> + cpuidle_wrap_enter
> + cpuidle_enter_tk
> + cpuidle_idle_call
> + cpu_idle
>
> After:
>
> Children Self Command Shared Object Symbols
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> - 40.70% 0.00% swapper [kernel.kallsyms] [k] cpuidle_wrap_enter
> cpuidle_wrap_enter
> cpuidle_enter_tk
> cpuidle_idle_call
> + cpu_idle
>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

... here ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

:-)

Thanks for the fix, checking with 'P' after 'E' to expand everything,
before and after, to then do a:

diff -u perf.hist.0 perf.hist.1

- Arnaldo

> tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> index 045c1e16ac59..1818d1275d02 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/ui/browsers/hists.c
> @@ -228,8 +228,10 @@ static void callchain_node__init_have_children(struct callchain_node *node)
> {
> struct callchain_list *chain;
>
> - list_for_each_entry(chain, &node->val, list)
> + if (!list_empty(&node->val)) {
> + chain = list_entry(node->val.prev, struct callchain_list, list);
> chain->ms.has_children = !RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&node->rb_root);
> + }
>
> callchain_node__init_have_children_rb_tree(node);
> }
> --
> 2.0.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/