Re: [tip:locking/arch] locking,arch,avr32: Fold atomic_ops

From: Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Date: Thu Aug 14 2014 - 15:32:37 EST


Around Thu 14 Aug 2014 21:30:14 +0200 or thereabout, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 09:27:20PM +0200, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
>> Around Thu 14 Aug 2014 10:19:44 -0700 or thereabout, tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> > Commit-ID: d325209b6000dcd13404ee946d2292e15a56718c
>> > Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/d325209b6000dcd13404ee946d2292e15a56718c
>> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> > AuthorDate: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 21:51:29 +0200
>> > Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > CommitDate: Thu, 14 Aug 2014 12:48:05 +0200
>> >
>> > locking,arch,avr32: Fold atomic_ops
>> >
>> > Many of the atomic op implementations are the same except for one
>> > instruction; fold the lot into a few CPP macros and reduce LoC.
>> >
>> > This also prepares for easy addition of new ops.
>> >
>> > Requires the asm_op because of eor.
>> >
>> > AVR32 is a bit special in that its ADD/SUB instructions are not
>> > symmetric. Its SUB instruction allows for an 21bit immediate.
>>
>> Fantastic, looks great.
>>
>> Do you have any plans for merge route? I'll happily do it through the avr32
>> tree, but if it is part of another series, it makes most sense to do it
>> there.
>
> I was thinking to keep the lot together in tip/locking/arch.
>
> Once that lands, I'll need to clean up and send pass 3, which
> _hopefully_ will be the last, although I had vague plans for a 4th as
> well.

OK, you have my ack, so go ahead and merge when you feel fit.

--
mvh
Hans-Christian Egtvedt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/