RE: [PATCHv6 2/2] dt/bindings: Add the DT binding documentation for endianness

From: Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed Aug 20 2014 - 05:29:16 EST


> Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 2/2] dt/bindings: Add the DT binding documentation for
> endianness
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:23:03PM +0800, Xiubo Li wrote:
> > Device-Tree binding for device endianness
> > Index Device Endianness properties
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > 1 BE 'big-endian'
> > 2 LE 'little-endian'
> >
> > For one device driver, which will run in different scenarios above
> > on different SoCs using the devicetree, we need one way to simplify
> > this.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <Li.Xiubo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/regmap/regmap.txt | 47
> ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/regmap/regmap.txt
>
> Sorry for jumping in so late. I think this binding documentation needs
> to be moved somewhere else. regmap is a Linux kernel specific
> implementation detail and therefore has no place in device tree binding
> descriptions. Furthermore the endianness properties described herein do
> apply to drivers that don't use regmap.
>
> Perhaps we need some top-level file that describes generic properties
> such as this?
>
> Thierry

Yes, I do agree.
And there are many devices that have the endian issue without using the
Regmap in our LS* SoCs.

And I also think one generic binding description of this will be much
better.

Where should we place it? In Documentation/devicetree/bindings/, or...?


Thanks,

BRs
Xiubo


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/