Re: [PATCH] block: Fix dev_t liftime allocations

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Tue Aug 26 2014 - 08:33:11 EST


On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:52:55PM -0600, Keith Busch wrote:
> Since the partition's release may be invoked from call_rcu's soft-irq
> context, the ext_dev_idr's mutex had to be replaced with a spinlock so
> as not so sleep.

> @@ -420,9 +420,9 @@ int blk_alloc_devt(struct hd_struct *part, dev_t *devt)
> }
>
> /* allocate ext devt */
> - mutex_lock(&ext_devt_mutex);
> + spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
> idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_KERNEL);
> - mutex_unlock(&ext_devt_mutex);
> + spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);

Can't use GFP_KERNEL if we're protected with a spinlock. See the comment
in lib/idr.c about idr_preload:

+ idr_preload(GFP_KERNEL);
- mutex_lock(&ext_devt_mutex);
+ spin_lock(&ext_devt_lock);
- idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_KERNEL);
+ idx = idr_alloc(&ext_devt_idr, part, 0, NR_EXT_DEVT, GFP_NOWAIT);
- mutex_unlock(&ext_devt_mutex);
+ spin_unlock(&ext_devt_lock);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/