Re: linux-3.16.2 queue (3.16.1+)

[Greg KH]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:27:27PM +0200, Matt wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Matt wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >>
> >> please consider adding the following 2 patches to 3.16.2:
> >>
> >> Jan Kara (1):
> >>       reiserfs: Fix use after free in journal teardown
> >>
> >> Jeff Mahoney (1):
> >>       reiserfs: fix corruption introduced by balance_leaf refactor
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Reason/Related:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83121
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83321
> >>
> >> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-998538-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-0.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Many thanks in advance
> >
> > I need git commit ids of these patches in Linus's tree, can you provide
> > those please?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> Sure:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=27d0e5bc85f3341b9ba66f0c23627cf9d7538c9d
> reiserfs: fix corruption introduced by balance_leaf refactor
> 
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=01777836c87081e4f68c4a43c9abe6114805f91e
> reiserfs: Fix use after free in journal teardown
> 
> 
> 
> are checkpatch warnings usually also fixed within stable releases ?

No, not at all, please read Documentation/stable_kernel_patches.txt for
what is acceptable for stable kernel patches.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/