Re: linux-3.16.2 queue (3.16.1+)

[Matt]

On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:27:27PM +0200, Matt wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:16:58PM +0200, Matt wrote:
>> >> Hi Greg,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> please consider adding the following 2 patches to 3.16.2:
>> >>
>> >> Jan Kara (1):
>> >>       reiserfs: Fix use after free in journal teardown
>> >>
>> >> Jeff Mahoney (1):
>> >>       reiserfs: fix corruption introduced by balance_leaf refactor
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Reason/Related:
>> >>
>> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83121
>> >>
>> >> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83321
>> >>
>> >> http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-998538-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-0.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Many thanks in advance
>> >
>> > I need git commit ids of these patches in Linus's tree, can you provide
>> > those please?
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> >
>> > greg k-h
>>
>>
>> Sure:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=27d0e5bc85f3341b9ba66f0c23627cf9d7538c9d
>> reiserfs: fix corruption introduced by balance_leaf refactor
>>
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=01777836c87081e4f68c4a43c9abe6114805f91e
>> reiserfs: Fix use after free in journal teardown
>>
>>
>>
>> are checkpatch warnings usually also fixed within stable releases ?
>
> No, not at all, please read Documentation/stable_kernel_patches.txt for
> what is acceptable for stable kernel patches.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


okay, will do

thanks for pointing that out


Regards

Matt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/