Re: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ftracetest: add kprobes on ftrace testcase

[Masami Hiramatsu]

(2014/10/21 20:59), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:21:05PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/10/20 19:52), Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> Add a kprobes on ftrace testcase. The testcase verifies that
>>> - enabling and disabling function tracing works on a function which
>>>   already contains a dynamic kprobe
>>> - adding and removing a dynamic kprobe works on a function which is
>>>   already enabled for function tracing
>>>
>>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Hi Masami,
> 
> thanks! How should these two patches go upstream?

Steven, could you pick this series to your tree?
I think it is better to manage ftracetest testcases in one tree.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/