Re: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kprobes: introduce weak arch_check_ftrace_location() helper function
From: Masami Hiramatsu
Date: Tue Oct 21 2014 - 08:11:29 EST
(2014/10/21 21:00), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:30:56PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> (2014/10/21 17:30), Heiko Carstens wrote:
>>> Introduce weak arch_check_ftrace_location() helper function which
>>> architectures can override in order to implement handling of kprobes
>>> on function tracer call sites on their own, without depending on
>>> common code or implementing the KPROBES_ON_FTRACE feature.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> Ok, thanks!
>
> If there are no objections, this patch and the s390 only patch will
> go upstream via the s390 tree. Is that ok?
Yeah, I think it's OK for me.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
Software Platform Research Dept. Linux Technology Research Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/