Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] kprobes: introduce weak arch_check_ftrace_location() helper function

[Steven Rostedt]

On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 21:11:16 +0900
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (2014/10/21 21:00), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 06:30:56PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> (2014/10/21 17:30), Heiko Carstens wrote:
> >>> Introduce weak arch_check_ftrace_location() helper function which
> >>> architectures can override in order to implement handling of kprobes
> >>> on function tracer call sites on their own, without depending on
> >>> common code or implementing the KPROBES_ON_FTRACE feature.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Thanks!
> > 
> > Ok, thanks!
> > 
> > If there are no objections, this patch and the s390 only patch will
> > go upstream via the s390 tree. Is that ok?
> 
> Yeah, I think it's OK for me.
> 

Fine with me.

Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/