Re: [PATCH 3/8] netfilter: Convert print_tuple functions to return void
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso
Date: Wed Nov 05 2014 - 18:21:38 EST
On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 02:24:29PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> From: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Since adding a new function to seq_file (seq_has_overflowed())
> there isn't any value for functions called from seq_show to
> return anything. Remove the int returns of the various
> print_tuple/<foo>_print_tuple functions.
>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/p/f2e8cf8df433a197daa62cbaf124c900c708edc7.1412031505.git.joe@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Cc: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: netfilter-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: coreteam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
I replied to this yesterday, but it seems some spam filter also
munched it. One comment below.
> @@ -202,9 +203,8 @@ static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> if (l4proto->print_conntrack)
> l4proto->print_conntrack(s, ct);
>
> - if (print_tuple(s, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
> - l3proto, l4proto))
> - goto release;
> + print_tuple(s, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL].tuple,
> + l3proto, l4proto);
>
> if (seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_ORIGINAL))
> goto release;
seq_print_acct returns seq_printf which is now void. I guess you have
to remove this check too.
> @@ -213,9 +213,8 @@ static int ct_seq_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
> if (seq_printf(s, "[UNREPLIED] "))
> goto release;
>
> - if (print_tuple(s, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple,
> - l3proto, l4proto))
> - goto release;
> + print_tuple(s, &ct->tuplehash[IP_CT_DIR_REPLY].tuple,
> + l3proto, l4proto);
>
> if (seq_print_acct(s, ct, IP_CT_DIR_REPLY))
> goto release;
And here.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/